Critical Perspectives & Commentary

Analysis and commentary from meditators, teachers, and researchers for readers exploring multiple viewpoints about intensive meditation training.

Can Meditation Actually Be Dangerous?

Can Meditation Actually Be Dangerous?
The author, a veteran of ten-day Vipassana retreats in the S. N. Goenka tradition, reflects on how years of systematic body-scanning meditation have made them more sensitive to stress, noise, and emotional stimuli rather than less reactive. Prompted by reports of meditation-related psychological distress—including research by Willoughby Britton and Jared Lindahl—the piece examines growing scientific and practitioner concerns about adverse effects ranging from anxiety to psychosis.

Through interviews with Vipassana teachers, psychiatrists, and Buddhist scholars such as Paul R. Fleischman, Bhikkhu Analayo, Thanissaro Bhikkhu, Grace Schireson, and Barry Magid, the article presents a nuanced debate: Are these harms caused by meditation itself, by inadequate preparation, by preexisting conditions, or by cultural context? While some defend intensive retreats as overwhelmingly beneficial when properly screened and taught, others argue for gradual introduction, better teacher training, and greater transparency about risks. Ultimately, the author does not reject meditation but calls for a more informed, contextualized, and psychologically aware approach to intensive practice.

OpinionsOpen Website

Privacy | Accept Cookies